FUND FULCRUM
January 2013
After two consecutive
years of plunge, the mutual fund industry managed to register a smart turnover
in 2012, with its assets base seen nearing Rs 8 lakh crore with an increase of
about Rs 2 lakh crore in 2012. Touching the highest level in
nearly three years, the assets managed by mutual funds jumped by more than 5%
to Rs 7.86 lakh crore in the three months ended December 2012. The country's 44 fund houses together
had an average AUM (Asset
Under Management) of Rs 7,86,543 crore in the October- December quarter of
2012, up from 7,47,333 crore in the previous three-month period. This is the highest level since
September 2010 (when AMFI started
declaring quarterly average numbers) and the third consecutive quarterly gain
in mutual fund assets. Further,
assets grew by 15%, or Rs 1.05 lakh crore, in the calendar year 2012 versus 1%
growth in 2011. The total
industry AUM stood at Rs 6.11 lakh crore at the end of 2011, while the same was
about Rs 6.26 lakh crore at 2010-end and Rs 6.65 lakh crore in 2009. The
rise in AUMs is due to sharp inflows into long-term debt and government
securities (gilts) on expectations that the Reserve Bank of India,
or RBI, would start lowering key interest rates soon. Bond yields and prices
move inversely. As some wide-ranging
reforms, initiated by the market regulator SEBI and the government, are yet to
translate into true business gains for the investors and fund houses, the
industry is hopeful of even better days ahead in 2013.
Inflows in income and liquid funds have contributed
the most to the industry's rising AUM. With inflows of Rs 89,302 crore, money
market funds AUM surged to Rs 1.77 lakh crore. A similar trend was seen in
liquid funds, where inflows rose to Rs 80,880 crore taking the assets managed
by the fund to Rs 3.87 lakh crore.
Similarly, equity funds' AUM rose to Rs 1.65 lakh crore despite registering outflows of more than Rs 9,300 crore. AUM of equity linked savings scheme too increased to Rs 25,027 crore though it saw investors pull out over Rs 1,400 crore in 2012.Interestingly, equity fund managers of mutual fund industry have betted big on banking space with investments worth more than Rs 42,000 investment, which was 20.59% of the industry's total equity assets under management.
Similarly, equity funds' AUM rose to Rs 1.65 lakh crore despite registering outflows of more than Rs 9,300 crore. AUM of equity linked savings scheme too increased to Rs 25,027 crore though it saw investors pull out over Rs 1,400 crore in 2012.Interestingly, equity fund managers of mutual fund industry have betted big on banking space with investments worth more than Rs 42,000 investment, which was 20.59% of the industry's total equity assets under management.
The total AUM of all the fund houses put
together has soared by an impressive 30% on strong inflows in categories such
as fixed income, gold schemes, and liquid funds, according to industry
estimates. About 80% of the
fund houses logged a rise in the average AUM in the December 2012 quarter.
L&T Mutual Fund registered the highest growth in assets in absolute as well
as percentage terms. The fund house’s assets grew by more than three times from
Rs 3,900 crore to Rs 12,100 crore in the latest quarter mainly due to the
addition of Fidelity Mutual Fund’s AUM post completion of its acquisition of
the latter in December 2012. Fidelity Mutual Fund had reported an average AUM
of Rs 7,100 crore in the September 2012 quarter as per AMFI data. In absolute
terms, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund followed with its average assets up by Rs
5,000 crore to Rs 81,400 crore in the December 2012 quarter. In percentage
terms, BOI AXA Mutual Fund recorded the second highest rise of 142% to end with
assets of Rs 700 crore. Among losers, Daiwa Mutual Fund declined the most, in percentage
terms, by nearly 32% in assets to end the quarter at Rs 500 crore. HDFC Mutual Fund retained
its top average AUM position across fund houses in the December 2012 quarter
with respect to total assets managed. The fund’s average AUM was up by Rs 3,600
crore or 3.7% to Rs 1,01,000 crore. Reliance Mutual Fund maintained the second
position at Rs 90,600 crore, up by 5% or Rs 4300 crore. ICICI Prudential Mutual
Fund was ranked third in the asset tally at Rs 81,400 crore; its average assets
were up Rs 5000 crore or 6.6%. The share of top 5 mutual funds’ assets was 54%
in the December 2012 quarter while the share of top 10 funds’ assets was 77%.
The bottom 10 fund houses continued to occupy less than 1% of the AUM.
Piquant Parade
Capital market
regulator, SEBI, has cancelled the registration of Fidelity Mutual Fund
following its buyout by L& T Finance. Consequently, Fidelity Mutual Fund, FIL Trustee Company, and FIL
Fund Management cannot carry out any activity as a mutual fund, trustee company
and asset management company, respectively, with immediate effect. In November 2012 L&T Finance, a part of
diversified group Larsen &
Toubro, had completed the acquisition of Fidelity's mutual fund
business in India for an undisclosed amount. L&T Finance is a part of
engineering conglomerate L&T Group and Fidelity Mutual Fund is part of the
US-based Fidelity Worldwide Investment.
ICICI
Prudential Mutual Fund bagged the best asset management company award at the
Money Today - Financial Planning Corporation (FPCIL) Awards held in Mumbai.
Franklin Templeton won the best equity fund house award while DSP Black Rock
walked away with the best debt fund house award. The best AMC was awarded based on
parameters like product education and awareness for customer, training of
agents and customers, number of complaints raised by customers, average
turnaround time for resolution of complaints, regulatory compliance, compliance
with regulations, penalties paid under various categories during 2011-12. The
best performing fund houses were selected on the basis of scheme return along
with weighted average yearly performance across all schemes as on 31 March
2012, quality of the asset base, determination of internal prudence limits,
size and scale, assets under management, number of employees, number of retail
investors and AUM for retail investments, product effectiveness, sector product
diversification, product innovativeness, etc.
Regulatory Rigmarole
In a move to regulate mutual fund distribution
business, SEBI has notified regulations to set up a Self Regulatory
Organisation (SRO) to monitor distributors of mutual fund and portfolio
management products on January 8, 2013.
In a bid to boost the number of distributors and enhance mutual fund sales, AMFI has decided to waive registration fees, estimated at Rs 3,000, for all registrations of first time distributors for a period of five months from February 01, 2013 to June 30, 2013. This initiative is largely with the intention of enlarging the distribution network and attracting new cadre of Distributors/IFAs (Independent Financial Advisors) for selling mutual fund products. The distributors registering under the category of individuals (including senior citizens) and new cadre of distributors need not pay the registration fees if they register during the same period and fulfill conditions outlined by AMFI. In November 2012, AMFI had slashed registration fees to Rs 3,000 for three years per distributor from Rs 5,000. NISM has launched the much-awaited one-day certification for the new cadre of distributors. These distributors include postal agents, retired government and semi-government officials (class III and above or equivalent) with a service of at least 10 years, retired teachers with a service of at least 10 years, retired bank officers with a service of at least 10 years, and bank correspondents. People qualifying as new cadre of distributors can either pass the existing NISM-Series-V-B: Mutual Fund Foundation Certification Examination or complete a one day NISM Mutual Fund Foundation CPE Program. These certificates will be valid for three years.
The government is considering an expansion in the scope of the Rajiv
Gandhi Equity Savings Scheme (RGESS) to attract more small investors to stocks. RGESS currently offers tax breaks to new
investors who do not have a demat account—an electronic registry for stocks and
debentures—or have a demat account, but are yet to invest in equities. The
government may now extend the scheme to investors with some equity investments.
RGESS allowed retail investors with no exposure to equities and annual income
of up to Rs10 lakh to invest
a maximum of Rs 50,000
in stocks and deduct half the amount from their taxable income. Going by the
current income-tax rate, this translates into a saving of a little more than Rs 7,500 for
taxpayers who invest Rs 50,000.The
government is also exploring the possibility of raising the tax benefit as well
as the maximum investment allowed under the scheme. For instance, the tax
benefit may be raised from the current 50% to 100%. This means an investor will
save at least Rs 15,000
in tax on an investment of Rs 50,000.
The maximum investment permissible may also be raised from Rs 50,000 to Rs 60,000, or even
more. The scheme was notified in December 2012 by SEBI. The government
initially insisted on direct investment in stocks, but SEBI also allowed
investments through mutual funds to be eligible for tax benefits under the
scheme. According to SEBI’s notification, securities eligible for investment
should belong to the BSE-100 or CNX 100 indices; investments in shares of some
high-profile public sector units are also eligible. Several mutual fund houses
are linking some of their investment plans to RGESS, but most of them are not
very upbeat, given the complexity of the scheme.
SEBI registration is a must for all investment advisors —
both individual and corporate, according to a new regulation by market
regulator SEBI. However,
professionals such as lawyers, chartered accountant and those giving generic
view on economic situation without charging and incidental to discharging their
professional services are exempt according to a SEBI notification on January
21, 2013. SEBI has mandated a minimum net worth requirement of Rs 25 lakh for
corporate and Rs 1 lakh for individuals. The new Investment Advisors
Regulations seek to impose numerous compliances on the investment advisors from
the perspectives of disclosures, record maintenance, and risk profiling of
clients. The
regulations prescribe minimum educational qualifications, capital requirements,
infrastructure requirements and personnel requirements such as compliance
officers. The regulations also bar advisors from earning any remuneration other
than fees from investors. SEBI
also seems to be contemplating a scenario wherein once a SRO is identified, the
regulation of investment advisors may be delegated to such a body. In the
absence of such delegation, it would be a daunting task for SEBI to regulate
hundreds of thousands of investment advisors. Hence the new regime would be
challenging for both investment advisors and SEBI.
An assessment by the International Monetary
Fund has found significant improvement in SEBI’s implementation of IOSCO’s
(International Organisation of Securities Commissions) principles related to
the securities markets. In its evaluation of the 25 systemically
important economies including India, IMF said SEBI’s regulations for every
market participant (including issuers, collective investment schemes, brokers,
portfolio managers, underwriters and recognised regional stock exchanges) are
robust. IMF observed that SEBI’s efforts in recent years to build a robust
market surveillance system as well as separate investigation and enforcement
departments have translated into effective enforcement of unfair trading
practices. IMF pointed out that SEBI faced three challenges in the form of
supervision of intermediaries (including fund managers and the mutual funds
they administer), improve its mechanisms to ensure compliance of issuers with
reporting requirements and develop better mechanisms to ensure compliance with
accounting and auditing requirements. It said SEBI’s decision to rely on
exchanges for self regulation or reviewing information submitted by listed
companies itself or leaving it to a quality review board for independent
oversight of auditors, will impact regulator’s resources. Though SEBI was
independent in practice, it could be superseded by the Government on policy
matters and its members could be removed without cause. The credibility of the
supervisory process would be strengthened further if these provisions were
remedied. The IMF said the securities market infrastructure in India is
segmented by product type, which could raise concerns on the overall efficiency
of the capital market. They are traded, cleared, and settled through different
entities subject to different legal frameworks and regulators. The cooperation
between RBI and SEBI on payment and settlement systems would benefit from
formal arrangements for information sharing and policy coordination.
Forty-two mutual funds investing in Asia stormed into the
list of the world's top 100 best performing equity funds in 2012 as regional
markets from India to Southeast Asia rallied. The top 100 list includes 14 equity
funds each from Pakistan and Thailand and nine from India, according to an
analysis of data for 27,153 actively managed equity mutual funds tracked by
Thompson Reuters Lipper globally. The Karachi Stock Exchange's benchmark
100 share index surged 49%, while Bangkok's benchmark SET index finished 35.8% up last year, making them
the two best performing share markets in Asia. The Asia-focused funds produced an
average return of 61.5%, outperforming the top market in the region as well as
the 18.6% advance in the MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside
Japan. Nearly 7,300 equity funds
investing in Asia and tracked by Lipper returned an average of 17.9% in 2012.
By comparison, non-Asian funds gained 13.3%.