FUND FULCRUM (contd.)
September 2014
The
top ten equity funds account for 34% or Rs. 80,300 crore of the total Rs. 2.35
lakh crore managed by the 300 plus equity mutual funds in India as on August
2014, according to a Motilal Oswal Securities report. HDFC Equity Fund and
HDFC Top 200 are the largest funds in the industry which together manage assets
of Rs. 28,800 crore. While HDFC Equity Fund (India’s largest fund in terms of
size) has an AUM of Rs. 15,800 crore, HDFC Top 200 manages Rs.13,000 crore. Both
these funds have significantly outperformed their benchmark during the five
year period. Value Research data shows that HDFC Equity Fund and HDFC Top 200
have delivered CAGR of 17% and 15% respectively in five years against the 10%
CAGR of their respective benchmarks. This was followed by Reliance Equity
Opportunities Fund and ICICI Prudential Focussed Bluechip Equity Fund which
manage AUMs of Rs. 8,100 crore and Rs.7,300 crore, respectively. While Reliance
Equity Opportunities Fund has delivered 22% CAGR, ICICI Prudential Focussed
Bluechip Equity Fund has given a CAGR of 17% in five years, according to Value
Research online. Both HDFC Mutual Fund and ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund have
three funds each in the list of top 10 equity funds. Other fund houses -
Reliance, Birla Sun Life, IDFC, and Franklin Templeton have one fund each in
the list.
Regulatory Rigmarole
|
In order to safeguard Indian markets from any
manipulative research reports, SEBI has notified norms for 'research analysts'
to remove any conflict of interest in their activities. Foreign entities acting as
research analysts for Indian markets or India-listed companies would need to
tie-up with a registered entity in India, while domestic players would also be
subjected to strict disclosures and scrutiny. The new norms would also cover
those providing advisory services similar to research analysts. These new norms
would be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Research Analysts)
Regulations, 2014. These regulations shall come into force on the 19th day from
the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. According to new norms,
every individual or entity desiring to function as a research analyst would
need to get registered after meeting the prescribed criteria regarding
qualifications and capital adequacy among others.
The Securities and Exchange
Board of India wants to bring domestic and foreign portfolio investors at par
on know your client norms in order to facilitate
framing of rules based on investor risk profiles. In its draft circular
seeking responses, the capital market regulator has proposed that the new
structure will have KYC norms for domestic investors, both individual and
institutional, based on their potential to bear risks — low, medium and high. The
existing system of KYC norms prescribes for two categories — individual and
non-individual (institutional) — in the domestic investor segment. Fulfilment
of KYC norms is mandatory for investment in the capital market. The market
intermediary will categorise the investors based on its risk management policy.
The policy will define the norms for categorisation of the investors. Once the category
is decided, minimum documents for KYC will be collected from the investors.
However, the intermediary will be free to ask for additional documents from any
category of investors. In
the proposed structure, investors with lower risk will have to submit lesser
number of documents and vice versa. But, if the investor is also trading in the
derivative segment (futures and options or F&O), he will have to submit
documents to ascertain his/her financial position in addition to documents
required for KYC. A standard account
opening form was prescribed by SEBI on December 26, 2013, for both domestic
investor categories. For all individual investors, it sought permanent account
number (PAN) and Aadhaar (if the applicant has one) accounts along with proofs
of identity and address. For non-individual or institutional investors, the
applicant is required to provide PAN and registration number such as CIN
(corporate identification number), residential address and photograph of
promoters/ partners/ karta/ trustees and whole-time directors. DIN (director
identification number) of whole time directors and Aadhar number of promoters
and partners are also required to be submitted. The draft has also prescribed
additional norms for investors participating in F&O trading in the equity
market. In case of individual investors, the market intermediary can ask for a
three-month bank statement (against the current norm of six months), salary
slip, copy of Form 16, and copy of demat account holding statements. This in the long-term, not
just for asset classification but also for investors and market participants,
will lead to a much better risk assessment of the capital market for the
regulator.
The Securities and Exchange
Board of India (SEBI) plans to make it mandatory for issuers to reserve 25% of
an initial public offering (IPO) for domestic mutual funds and insurers. However, if investors do not
subscribe to their portion fully, the IPO could be considered a failure.
According to SEBI, a higher participation of 25% of the issue size or half of
that slotted for qualified institutional bidders would enable a fairer
valuation. Besides, it will benefit both issuers and investors as these local
institutional investors play the conservative card when it comes to pricing,
aligning more with retail investors. At present, the issuer allots 50% of the
shares in an IPO to QIBs, which include overseas and domestic funds, 15% to
non-institutional investors, including high net worth individuals and
corporates, and 35% to retail investors.
AMFI has asked AMCs to avoid the practice of
intimating distributors and investors in advance about dividend and bonus
announcements. The industry body has
said that AMCs should follow the rule in its true spirit. This has come in the
wake of a sudden spurt in the demand of dividend and bonus option in mutual
funds. Post the changes in tax structure of debt funds, arbitrage funds gained
popularity because of their tax efficiency. Few fund houses like JM
Financial and Religare Invesco introduced an annual bonus option in their
arbitrage funds.
In a bid to prevent money laundering, fund houses are supposed to
identify ultimate beneficial owners (UBO) in the case of non-individual
investors (listed companies are exempted) as part of the SEBI guidelines
pertaining to anti money laundering. SEBI defines UBO as the natural person or persons, who ultimately
own, control or influence a client and/or persons on whose behalf a transaction
is being conducted, and includes a person who exercises ultimate effective
control over a legal person or arrangement. Investors such as unlisted
companies, unincorporated association / body of individuals,
trusts, limited liability partnerships, religious trusts, etc. are required to
furnish details regarding UBO. Individuals, listed companies, foreign
investors, are not required to comply with this rule. Non individual
investors have to furnish PAN along with filled up UBO form. UBO forms can be
downloaded from AMC websites. A KYC acknowledgement copy has to be submitted
along with the UBO form. In this form, quoting the relevant UB code (10 UB
codes have been prescribed by SEBI) is mandatory.
According to a circular
issued by SEBI, mutual fund houses are subject to trading member level position
limits on investments in Government bond futures. The
capital market regulator has said that each fund scheme would have to
separately comply with client level restrictions on the instrument. Trading
members are allowed to have gross open positions of 10% of the total open
interest of a bond future or Rs. 6 billion ($98.10 million), whichever is
higher. Client level restrictions are capped at 3% of open interest or Rs. 2
billion at present, whichever is higher.
Consolidation in the mutual fund sector could
see a few fund houses getting disproportionately higher assets and thereby
raise the concentration risk. The sector has seen exit of three fund houses
—Morgan Stanley, ING, and Pine Bridge Investments — in nine months. Daiwa and
Fidelity also have exited in recent years. The tightening of regulations and
lack of profitability forced several fund houses to close. The top 10 mutual
fund houses managed 80% of the sector’s assets and more entities could be
exiting. A large number of assets managed by a few entities would mean a fewer
number of fund managers managing a larger number of investors’ money. Investors
should have more of a choice. The recent increase in the net worth requirement
from Rs 10 crore to Rs 50 crore has made it difficult for the smaller entities.
Their promoters are uncertain about putting more money into the business
at a time when business prospects are difficult. More than half the AMCs
do not generate profits at present. According to smaller entities, the dominant
players, with their distribution network and deep pockets, are difficult to
combat. Currently, there are 45 entities in the sector, managing a corpus of a
little over Rs 10 lakh crore. The top five — HDFC, ICICI Prudential, Reliance,
Birla Sun Life and UTI — collectively have an asset size of Rs 5.4 lakh crore,
nearly 55% of the total assets under management.