FUND FULCRUM
January 2015
The year 2015 gets off on a
high note for the Indian mutual fund industry. The
industry's AAUM exceeded the Rs 11 lakh crore mark during the December 2014 quarter. Average
AUM rose by 4.34%, Rs 45946 crore, to Rs 11.06 lakh crore (excluding fund of
funds) in the quarter ended December 2014, according to a CRISIL report. The
industry's average assets increased by 26.14% or Rs 2.29 lakh crore in 2014.
Growth in the third quarter was primarily driven by rise in assets of equity
funds. Equity funds' average AUM gained 15.53% or Rs 45121 crore to hit
record high of Rs 3.36 lakh crore. During the year 2014, the category
gained 71.68% or Rs 1.40 lakh crore. For 11 months of the year, the
category registered inflows of Rs 49726 crore, compared with outflows of Rs
12705 crore in the similar period of 2013. Long-term debt funds' average
AUM gained 6.37% or Rs 4191 crore to Rs 70030 crore, while gilt funds' assets
rose 22.86% or by Rs 1299 crore to Rs 6984 crore. For the calendar year,
long-term debt and gilt funds' assets declined 35% and 9 % respectively. Short-term
debt funds rose for the third consecutive quarter, up 11.04% or by Rs 9530
crore to Rs 95831 crore. Ultra short-term debt funds rose for the fourth
consecutive quarter, up 7.48%, or Rs 7970 crore, to Rs 1.15 lakh crore. In
2014, short-term debt funds and ultrashort-term debt funds witnessed 32% and
42% rise in assets respectively. Liquid funds were the biggest drag
on industry assets, with the category falling 5.25 %, or Rs 15025 crore, to
Rs 2.71 lakh crore. The category witnessed 17% rise in assets in
2014. Assets of fixed maturity plans (FMPs) fell for the second
consecutive quarter, down 4.29%, or Rs 7085 crore, to Rs 1.58 lakh crore. Gold
exchange traded funds (ETFs) continued the downtrend as the category marked
its fifth consecutive quarterly fall. The category's AUM fell 6.76%, or Rs 521
crore, to Rs 7178 crore. This is due to persistent outflows despite a
marginal rise in price of underlying assets during the quarter. Average
AUM of direct plans rose 4.14%, or Rs 14619 crore, to Rs 3.68 lakh crore at
the end of 2014. The share of direct plans, however, remained steady at
33% of the industry's AUM (excluding fund of funds) in the reported quarter
compared with the previous quarter but was higher compared with 30% a year ago.
Equity mutual
funds reported an addition of over 12 lakh accounts of investors in the first
nine months of the current fiscal (2014-15). The number of equity folios rose
to 3,0,392,991 till December 2014 -- the nine month period of the
current fiscal from 2,91,80,922 for the entire last fiscal ended March 31,
2014, according to SEBI data. Mutual funds industry reported net inflows of
over Rs 50,000 crore in equity funds in the April-December period of the
current fiscal (2014-15), which helped the industry grow its folio count.
|
HDFC
Mutual Fund has retained its top position across fund houses in the December 2014
quarter with respect to total assets managed as per data released by the
Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI). The fund's average AUM was up
by Rs 8987 crore or 6.35%, to Rs 1.50 lakh crore -- an industry
milestone. ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund maintained its second position at
Rs 1.37 lakh crore, up by 7.13%, or Rs 9100 crore. Reliance Mutual Fund
was ranked third at Rs 1.26 lakh crore as its average AUM rose by Rs 4001 crore
or 3.28%. Of the 43 mutual fund houses that declared their average AUM, 30
fund houses posted a rise. The share of the top-five fund houses was 55%,
which is same as the previous quarter.
Piquant Parade
Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund is planning to acquire Deutsche Mutual
Fund. Both the parties have completed the due-diligence process. DWS AMC is
valued at 3-4% of its AUM, i.e. not less than Rs. 680 crore. Franklin
Templeton Mutual Fund manages AUM of Rs. 63,643 crore while DWS AMC manages Rs.
22,670 crore as on December 31, 2014. If the deal goes through, Franklin
Templeton Mutual Fund will overtake SBI Mutual Fund to become the sixth largest
AMC in terms of AUM.
Goldman Sachs
is in advanced talks to sell its mutual fund business, including the central
public sector ETF launched with great fanfare last year. The firm is in
talks with Wisdom Tree, a US-based exchange-traded fund (ETF) asset manager. Goldman
may sell the business for about Rs 120 crore, the same price it paid to acquire
Benchmark Asset Management in July 2011.
Four Indian fund houses – BNP Paribas, Baroda Pioneer, ICICI Prudential,
and HSBC have won awards at Best of the Best Awards 2014. Asia Asset
Management’s Best of the Best Awards gives recognition to financial
institutions and pension funds for outstanding achievements over the past
calendar year. Best of the Best Awards is broken down into three divisions: a)
performance, b) country, and c) regional awards, to acknowledge each and every
area where excellence has occurred. ICICI Prudential has won the award for
India’s best fund house. Similarly, Baroda Pioneer and HSBC bagged awards for
the best investor education and the best pension fund manager respectively. While
Anand Shah of BNP Paribas bagged the CIO of the year award, Nimesh Shah of
ICICI Prudential was adjudged as the CEO of the year. Meanwhile, Chennai based
financial service provider, IFMR Investment Managers won award for the most
innovative product.
Regulatory Rigmarole
Keeping in view the challenges faced by the fund managers in managing
offshore pooled assets, market regulator SEBI may relax the restriction of
appointing a separate fund manager, the requirement to replicate portfolio, and
the criteria of minimum 20 investors (with no single investor holding more than
25%). To make it easier for domestic mutual
funds to manage offshore pooled assets, SEBI proposed to drop '20-25 rule',
which requires a minimum of 20 investors and a cap of 25% investment by an
individual investor in a particular scheme, for certain foreign entities.
Besides, SEBI has suggested to do away with the rule that requires appointment
of separate fund manager for managing an offshore fund and replication of
portfolio in regard to Category I and Category II FPIs (Foreign Portfolio
Investors). Category I FPIs includes government and government related entities
and Category II FPIs includes both broad based entities such as mutual funds,
investments trusts and persons such as portfolio managers, investment managers,
asset management companies, banks among others.
With the tax-saving season under way, mutual funds have started aggressively promoting their equity-linked savings schemes
(ELSS). These get a benefit under the Section 80C limit of Rs 1.5 lakh. However, investors are to no longer get the dividend reinvestment option. The Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI)
has written a letter to asset management companies (AMCs) to stop offering this
option. The reason: Rising
complaints during withdrawals. Fund houses already have Rs 36,257 crore in
ELSS. The letter says investors often forget to tick the ‘Dividend payout
sub-option’, resulting in reinvestment of the dividend by default. Since the
original amount invested qualifies for deduction under section 80C, even though
the dividend reinvested does not qualify for any such deduction, the lock-in
period rule is often misconstrued by investors, who expect to withdraw the
entire balance of units (including dividend reinvested) at the time of
redemption, after a three-year lock-in period of the original investment. They cannot
do it, due to lock-in of each transaction of dividend re-investment, leading to
investor grievances.
Stringent compliance requirements under
the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act of the US have led to several mutual fund houses
avoiding fresh investments from American investors. To lower the reporting burden, many mutual funds including HDFC MF,
ICICI Prudential MF, Quantum MF, Baroda Pioneer MF, and DSP Blackrock MF have even barred investment
from residents of US and Canada for
some of their schemes, while others are not very keen on investments from such
entities. Moreover, some MFs may even stop taking investments from NRIs till
clarity emerges over FATCA agreement
between India and the US. FATCA is a US law whereby foreign financial
institutions across the world would have to report to the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on any transactions of clients who could be
subjected to American tax laws. The non-compliance with FATCA entails 30%
withholding tax on the US source payments. Moreover, wrong or incorrect
reporting may also have similar consequences. While India and the US had agreed
"in substance" last year to sign an Inter-Governmental Agreement over
FATCA, the final pact could not be signed within the earlier deadline of
December 31, 2014 and it had to be extended. All financial institutions with
exposure to the US were also required to register with the US tax department
IRS under FATCA before January 1, 2015, but many Indian entities are yet to do
so. The US taxpayers under FATCA include US citizens, US residents (green card
holders) and non-residents who own foreign financial accounts or other offshore
assets. The FATCA provisions will have a big impact on flows from US. The
Indian mutual fund industry, which is attracting a significant flow from NRIs
is likely to be impacted by new FATCA.
Despite
exponential growth of India’s mutual fund sector in 2014, the sector has gone
through consolidation with a slew of mergers and acquisitions. The Rs 11-lakh
crore sector saw three foreign entities selling out to domestic peers. The year
began with the surprise exit of Morgan Stanley, acquired by HDFC MF for an
undisclosed sum. It was the second US-based fund house, after Fidelity, to exit
India operations in recent years. Then, in May 2014, Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund
acquired ING MF, again for an undisclosed sum. The third deal was between Kotak
MF and Pinebridge Investments in September 2014. The exit of the three smaller
fund houses was due to the challenging landscape in MFs, dominated by larger
entities. Small fund houses find the cost structure too high to sustain in a
tightly-regulated sector. A higher net worth norm of Rs 50 crore introduced by
the Securities and Exchange Board of India was also blamed for the exits. The
year had begun with 46 asset management companies but the year ended with three
less after the exits.
No comments:
Post a Comment