FUND FULCRUM (Contd.)
October 2018
The
latest S&P Indices Versus Active (SPIVA) India Scorecard suggests that 88%
of Indian equity large-cap funds underperformed their benchmark in the one-year
period ending June 2018. Beating benchmark post introduction of total return
index (TRI), a benchmark that captures dividend income, has become difficult. Asia
Index, a joint-venture between BSE and S&P Dow Jones Indices, runs the
SPIVA scorecard. The large-cap equity funds witnessed a low survivorship rate
(68%) and a low style consistency (13%) over the 10-year period ending in June
2018. Over the 10-year period, the return spread for actively managed large-cap
equity funds between the first and the third quartile break points of the fund
performance, stood at 3.6%, pointing to a relatively large spread in fund
returns. In line with the historically volatile nature of the mid-/small-cap
segment of the Indian equity market, the return spread for actively managed
mid-/small-cap equity funds was even higher at 5.1% over the same period.
Simply put, the spread in fund returns shows the difference in fund
performance. The asset-weighted return for large-cap equity funds was 51 bps
higher than the equal-weighted return over the 10-year period. In contrast, the
margin between asset- and equal- weighted returns for ELSS funds was only 40
bps. (Asset weighted returns factors in the AUM size of the schemes whereas
equal-weighted returns is the arithmetic mean of the returns of the schemes). Over
the three-year period ending in June 2018, the asset-weighted return of
large-cap funds was 1.3% lower than their benchmark, the S&P BSE 100.
During the same period, the asset-weighted return of Indian Equity
Mid-/Small-Cap funds was 3.1% lower than their benchmark, the S&P BSE 400
Mid Small Cap Index.
Regulatory Rigmarole
In a recent letter to all public sector
banks (PSBs), the Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance has
asked these banks not to incentivise their employees with commission for cross
selling of financial products such as insurance and mutual fund products.
In fact, the ministry said that there is no need to incentivise the employees
as they work for a fixed salary. Any income accrued of third party product
sales is the income of banks. A few years back, Central Vigilance
Commission (CVC) had recommended the finance ministry that PSBs should stop the
practice of incentivizing their employees with cash benefits. The commission
for the cross selling is received by the bank and booked as an Income. The bank
in turn runs reward and recognition programme for its employees. The parameters
for such schemes involve performance in bank’s core business and cross sell.
The GST council is likely to defer the
implementation of reverse charge mechanism (RCM) until March, 2019. Distributors
earning less than Rs.20 lakh a year are likely to avail RCM benefits until the
government issues a notification to withdraw these benefits. The expected
deferment will benefit distributors earning less than Rs.20 lakh who do not
have GST registration. In case they are earning less than Rs.20 lakh, but have
GST registration, they can cancel their GST registration by visiting this link https://services.gst.gov.in/services/login.
For distributors with GST registration, AMCs continue to follow forward charge
mechanism, i.e., AMCs will pay the gross commission to them. These distributors
can avail of the benefits of input credit. Earlier in October 2017, the GST
council had first introduced RCM to benefit small businesses until March 2018.
Later, the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Custom (CBIC) had extended RCM
benefits until June 2018 and then September 2018.
In a major
setback for online distributors relying on Aadhaar based eKYC to onboard new clients,
the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) has asked KYC registration
agencies (KRAs) to immediately stop doing Aadhaar based authentication for
eKYC. In
fact, the UIDAI has asked KRAs to give them in writing that they have stopped
using Aadhaar based authentication for eKYC. Ever since the Supreme Court has
come out with its verdict on Aadhaar, there has been lack of clarity among fund
houses, R&T agents and distributors on using Aadhaar based eKYC for
onboarding new clients. In fact, a few distributors and fund houses continued
with Aadhaar based eKYC to onboard new clients. With this, new age distributors
would be affected the most as they completely rely on Aadhaar based eKYC to
onboard a new client. UIDAI has been reportedly exploring ways to help
companies relying on Aadhaar based eKYC to onboard new customers. eKYC may
become operational once again. UIDAI is said to have been exploring ways to
help companies relying on Aadhaar based eKYC to onboard new customers, which
includes fund houses and online distributors. One approach being considered is
to use a live picture of customer with time stamp and photo of a
government-issued ID card. Customers can upload their live photograph along
with the valid ID proof to complete the KYC process.
Following the Supreme Court’s verdict on
Aadhaar, AMFI has discontinued online registration and renewal of ARN for
mutual fund distributors with immediate effect. This has come after the
UIDAI has asked AMFI, R&T agents and KRAs to give them in writing that they
have stopped using Aadhaar based authentication. So far, distributors used to
furnish Aadhaar number to register and renew their ARN number through online
process. AMFI has assured that they will start the online process soon.
Currently, even for online renewal of ARN and EUIN, Aadhaar was required for
fetching the photograph of the ARN/ EUIN holder from Aadhaar database. However,
since Aadhaar based authentication is no longer permissible, AMFI is in the
process of modifying the online ARN/ EUIN renewal facility to facilitate
uploading of the photograph by the ARN/ EUIN holder (in lieu of fetching the
same from Aadhaar database). Till then, distributors can continue to register
or renew their ARN through physical process. Currently, distributors have to
undergo a mandatory six hours of classroom training in order to renew their
ARN. To ease the registration renewal process, NISM has already introduced an
online CPE training for distributors. Once distributors take this training,
NISM issues a certificate. Distributors have to send their certificates to CAMS
along with a DD of Rs.1,500 in favour of AMFI as renewal fee. Typically, the
entire physical process of ARN renewal takes around two months. Earlier in June
2017, AMFI had introduced an online ARN registration and renewal facility for
distributors.
SEBI has banned upfront commission in
mutual funds with immediate effect. In fact, the market regulator has directed
fund houses to follow all-trail model to compensate their distributors. In
line with its earlier proposals, the market regulator has clarified that fund
houses will have to pay such commissions from scheme and not from AMC book. In
addition, SEBI has asked fund houses not to do upfronting of any trail
commission. However, fund houses can do upfronting of trail commission on SIPs
subject to fulfilment of the following pre-defined conditions.
- · Upfronting of trail commission is allowed only for first time investor based on Pan
- · Fund houses can pay 1% upfronting on SIP of up to Rs.5000 for a maximum period of 3 years For instance, if a first time investor starts SIP of Rs.5000 for three years, distributors will get close to Rs.1800 as upfronting of trail commission
- · Fund houses can claw back such a commission on a pro-rata basis from distributors if investors discontinue SIP for which the commission is paid
- · SEBI will take appropriate action if it finds irregularity in this practice
SEBI believes
that shifting to all trail model can bring transparency in expenses, reduce
portfolio churning and reduce mis-selling in mutual funds.
In a bid to increase transparency in mutual
funds, SEBI has asked fund houses to disclose investment and advisory fees and
other expenses along with the gross commission of distributors with immediate
effect. Simply put, the half yearly consolidated account statement (CAS)
will now have two more columns for the disclosure of management fees and other
expenses along with the gross commission paid to distributors. However, the
market regulator has not clarified if such disclosures will be in percentage
terms or absolute terms. In a press release SEBI said, “The scheme’s average
total expense ratio (in percentage terms) along with the
break up between investment and advisory
fees, commission paid to the distributor and
other expenses for the period for
each scheme’s applicable plan (regular or
direct or both) where the concerned
investor has actually invested in.” This commission figure
includes all direct monetary payments and other payments made in the form of
gifts/rewards, trips, event sponsorships etc. by AMCs to distributors. Also,
this disclosure comes with a footnote that reads, “The commission in Col 9
above indicates gross commission received by the distributor against the
respective investment and does not exclude costs incurred by distributors such
as service tax (wherever applicable, as per existing rates), operating costs,
etc.”
SEBI has asked fund houses to publish daily performance
report of their schemes on AMFI website.
In a recent circular, SEBI has asked fund houses to upload their daily scheme
performance data on AMFI website. Currently, AMCs update their scheme
performance reports on monthly basis on their own website. However, this data
is of no use in volatile markets. Having daily performance data will help an
investor make a more informed decision. On the flip side, daily tracking may
end up scaring jittery investors further during volatile markets. While
investors could access daily performance on mutual fund tracking websites, the
AMFI website will make scheme comparison easy for investors and assure
investors about authenticity of data. SEBI said that CAGR returns of all plans
of a scheme and their corresponding (TRI) benchmark will be available on the
AMFI portal. The returns will for the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year and since
inception time periods. In addition, AMCs will also have to upload 7 days,
15 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months performance of overnight funds, liquid
funds, ultra-short duration funds, low duration funds, and money market funds
on the portal. The returns will be calculated based on previous day’s NAV.
Other relevant data such as scheme AUM and previous day NAV will be included in
the disclosure. To increase the ease of understanding, the data will have
filtering options based on scheme-type, plan-type as well as sorting feature
based on return period. SEBI has given a month’s time to fund houses to comply
with these regulations.
The regulator
has clarified that it would make changes to the MF regulations before
introducing new TER slabs. The SEBI circular says, “All other decisions of the
Board with respect to ‘Review of Total Expense Ratio (TER) of
Mutual Fund Schemes’ as mentioned in the
press release dated September 18, 2018
issued by SEBI would be implemented pursuant to
amendment to SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996. Earlier in September, SEBI
has announced fresh AUM slabs and given a roadmap to fund houses on how they
can make changes to their TER based on asset size of the scheme. While the
market regulator has capped TER at 2.25% in equity funds and 2% in other than
equity funds, SEBI has followed economies of scale to reduce TER
systematically. Similarly, fund houses cannot charge more than 1.25% in close
end equity funds and 1% in close end debt funds. SEBI has also asked fund
houses to charge a maximum TER of 1% on passive funds such as index funds and
ETFs. On fund of funds (FOFs), SEBI has said that FOFs investing in liquid, index
and ETFs cannot charge over 1%. On the other hand, FOFs investing primarily in
actively managed funds can charge up to 2.25% in equity funds and 2% in other
than equity funds.
Most of you must be aware of UTI Mastershare Unit Scheme. It is
the first market linked equity scheme, which did not guarantee returns.
Earlier, funds like UTI Unit Scheme 64 either offered assured returns or
indicated returns. However, it was the industry’s first market linked product
but was a close end scheme listed on stock exchanges. In those days, there was
no concept of open ended, daily NAV and trail commission. Fund houses used to
launch close end funds or interval funds to collect fresh money. However, the
course of Indian mutual fund industry has changed with private players. Kothari
Pioneer was the first private mutual fund that many believe has laid the foundation
stone of the modern mutual fund industry. Be it an open end fund or SIP, this
fund house has brought numerous innovations in the industry that we are today
proud of. Fund management too came with its unique set of challenges. The
prospect of meeting large scale redemption in open end structure was a daunting
one. To mitigate these risks, Mutual Funds used to maintain cash levels of 10%
then. However, the biggest challenge was doing research on companies. There
were no quarterly reports then. They used to wait for annual reports of the
companies. A few companies were more generous as they came out with half yearly
report. There was no concept of analyst meetings in companies. They used to
approach company secretaries with their stock holding proof seeking appointment
with the senior management of the companies. Also, they used to attend AGM just
to ask questions to management. At that time, it was rare for brokers to share
their reports with them. In fact, there was a misconception in many minds about
stocks with some equating stock market with gambling. A lot of innovations that we are
witnessing today have come from private mutual funds. Private mutual funds were
the ones to start the practice of sharing rationale for stock selection and
holdings through monthly factsheets. Right from open end funds and daily NAVs
to sectoral funds, debt funds or even SIPs, private mutual funds have
strengthened the foundation built by the public sector players.
No comments:
Post a Comment